Alternative Bloom’s
Original
|
@Xris32
|
Science
|
Maths
| |
Creating
|
Creating
|
Concluding
|
Refining
| |
Evaluating
|
Understanding
|
Evaluating
|
Evaluating
| |
Analysing
|
Evaluating
|
Analysing
|
Applying
| |
Applying
|
Analysing
|
Using
|
Recognising
| |
Understanding
|
Remembering
|
Remembering
|
Seeing
| |
Remembering
|
Parodying
|
Copying
|
Looking
| |
A blog post by @xris32 considered Bloom’s and what it might have a form that was less useful for the way he sees English teaching and learning. While I like Bloom’s I have always had problems with it as a taxonomy. It is not an ordered list where the base is used to build the layers upwards. I will not go into why this is but it is quite easy to show it does not work in the way a taxonomy works. As an aside, for me, SOLO is a much more effective taxonomy.
I thought I would have a god at seeing what happened if I tried to create, top level Bloom’s stuff, a science Bloom’s and a maths one just to see if I could.
I left a column empty to see if you thought there were different lists that would logically apply on different circumstances. Be interested in any thoughts you have.
No comments:
Post a Comment